Skip to main content

This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

0625

reference
901-tree-1
name
0625
tree-preservation-order

undefined

901-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-0.964195 50.861221)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-0.964095 50.861210,-0.964100 50.861230,-0.964114 50.861247,-0.964135 50.861261,-0.964163 50.861271,-0.964193 50.861274,-0.964224 50.861271,-0.964252 50.861262,-0.964275 50.861249,-0.964289 50.861231,-0.964294 50.861212,-0.964290 50.861192,-0.964276 50.861175,-0.964254 50.861161,-0.964227 50.861151,-0.964196 50.861148,-0.964165 50.861151,-0.964138 50.861159,-0.964115 50.861173,-0.964101 50.861191,-0.964095 50.861210)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL